Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  116 / 160 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 116 / 160 Next Page
Page Background

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

continued

for the year ended 30 June 2016

Hyprop Investments Limited

Group annual financial statements 2016

114

2.

Investment property

continued

2.5 Investment property valuation

continued

Valuation techniques underlying management’s estimation of fair value

The valuations were determined using discounted cash flow projections. These inputs include:

Future rental cash flows:

Based on the location, type and quality of the properties and supported by the terms of any existing leases or

other contracts or external evidence such as current market rentals for similar properties.

Discount rates:

The discount rate is the rate of return used in a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the present value of future cash

flows, and take into account an assessment of the uncertainty in the amount and timing of future cash flows.

Vacancy rates:

Based on current and expected future market conditions after expiry of any current leases, as well as tenant failures during

the course of a lease.

Maintenance costs:

Including necessary investments to maintain functionality of the property for its expected useful life.

Capitalisation rates:

Based on location, size and quality of the properties and taking into account market data at the valuation date.

Terminal value:

Taking into account assumptions regarding maintenance costs, vacancy rates and market rentals.

The valuation methods applied by the independent valuers were the same as the prior year.

Fair value hierarchy

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants

at the measurement date, regardless of whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique. In estimating

the fair value of an asset or a liability, the group takes into account the characteristics of the asset or liability if market participants would take

those characteristics into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

In addition, for financial reporting purposes, fair value measurements are categorised into level 1, 2 or 3 based on the degree to which the

inputs to the fair value measurements are observable. The three levels are explained as follows:

Level 1

– inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company can access at the measurement date.

These quoted prices are unadjusted.

Level 2

– these are inputs, other than quoted prices included in level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or

indirectly.

Level 3

– inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Recurring fair value

measurements – level 3

June 2016

Valuation

R000

June 2015

Valuation

R000

South Africa

(1)

Shopping centres

25 282 472

23 408 630

Value centres

1 109 000

1 112 000

Standalone offices

108 300

480 000

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding South Africa)

Ikeja City Mall (Lagos, Nigeria)

2 322 426

Total group

28 822 198

25 000 630

(1)

Excludes property held-for-sale

Non-recurring fair value

measurements – level 3

June 2016

Valuation

R000

June 2015

Valuation

R000

Assets held-for-sale

1 230 775

1 225 775

Total group

1 230 775

1 225 775

There are inter-relationships between unobservable inputs. Expected vacancy rates may impact the yield, with higher vacancy rates resulting

in higher yields. An increase in future rental income may be linked with higher costs. If the remaining lease term increases, the yield may

decrease.